Autonomy of the family in the modern world
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to understand autonomy of the family in the ‘modern’ world by locating the family in the historical changes that led to its present form. The autonomy of the family was shaped in two ways, as collective mentalitiés and as private space.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The present research problem concerns an important inquiry into the private space of the family and the role of the state in shaping and governing the individual by intervening in the family. The paper uses the method of historical inquiry and analysis of reference literature.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: After having defined the aim of the study and the fundamental concepts (modernity, autonomy, mentalitiés) there has been presented the psychogenic history of the family in the context of France. This is followed by the presentation of changes in mentalitiés and private space in the family, with a special emphasis on the changing focus on the child in the family. The essential part of the argumentation was also to build the concept of autonomy through the changes in mentalitiés and private space that unfolds in three stages of the psychogenic history of the family.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The result of this argumentation is the autonomous space of the family in the modern times, which is impacted by the state and popular culture.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This analysis confirms the changes of autonomy in the family from the middle, to the modern and across the contemporary times through the conceptions of (i) collective mentalitiés, (ii) private space and sociability and (iii) governmentality. It argues that ever since the turn of the modern, the family has never been autonomous, though in law it appears to be a ‘private space’. Family in the contemporary times is insidiously governed by messages and images that circulate in media. Autonomy of the modern family has always been under threat. The arguments point to the necessity to question and problematize the contemporary conceptions of family and the child as mirrored in the domain of popular culture.
References
Ariés, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood. London: Harmondsworth.
Ariés, P. (1977). Apropos de La Volonte´de Savoir. L’Arc no. 70, 32.
Ariés, P. (1979). The Family and the City. Crite`re no. 25 (Spring 1979), 251-255.
Ariés, P. (1981). The Hour of our Death. (Helen Weaver Trans.) New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.
Baker, B. (1998). Childhood-as-rescue and Teacher-as-redeemer: a history of the present. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Burman, E. (2007). Deconstructing Developmental Psychology. New York: Routledge.
Donzelot J. (1979a). The Policing of Families. New York: Pantheon Books.
Donzelot J. (1979b). The poverty of political culture. Ideol. Conscious, 5, 73-86.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage books.
Foucault, M. (1982). Subject and Power. Critical inquiry 8.4.,777-795.
Foucault, M. (2006). Madness and Civilisation (English Translation). France: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M., Rabinow, P., & Faubion, J. (1997). The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984. London: Allen Lane.
Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1980). Beyond the Best Interests of the Child. London: Burnett Books.
Hutton, P. (2004). Philippe Ariès and the politics of French cultural history. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Mousseau, J. (1975). The Family, a Prison of Love: An Interview with Phillipe Ariés. Psychology Today, September 1975, 53-58.
Rancière, J. (2004). The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. (Gabriel Rockhill Trans.) New York, NY: Continuum.
Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. 2nd edition. London, New York: Free Association Books.
Rose, N., Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2, 83-104.
Schnell, R.L. (1977). Integrating Concepts of Childhood and the History of Education. The Irish Journal of Education / Iris Eireannach an Oideachais, 12(1), 51-68.
________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2017 HORIZONS OF EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The work will be simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND license, which permits others to share the work with proper credit given to the author and the original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in another journal), provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
We allow and encourage authors to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before and during the submission process, as this can foster beneficial exchanges and lead to earlier and increased citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following academic networking platforms:
