The deaf humanist. Can music philosophy educate listeners today?
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This article is intended as a contribution to discussion on the role of music philosophy in educating contemporary participants in the world of culture. From a broader perspective, it fosters reflection on the condition of the humanities today.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS:The author makes use of traditional literary studies, employing, as a music philosopher, a speculative method and availing herself of the tools of analytical philosophy; she also refers to the empirical experiences of musicians and listeners.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The argumentation is based on metacritical analysis of the subject literature within the scope of trends and challenges in music philosophy. The author considers the possibility of educating sensitive and active receivers of classical music. She invokes the reflection of the philosopher Peter Kivy in light of the discussion carried on with him by James O. Young and Jerrold Levinson. Irrespective of their differences of opinion, these philosophers all emphasised the role of the aesthetic education of the listener. The author highlights points on which the philosophers’ dispute is merely superficial.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The subject literature is dominated by the analytical model. This results partly from the obligation to imitate the sciences that weighs upon the humanities and also from subjecting the results of humanistic reflection to processes of parametrisation. Music philosophy and musicology are increasingly divorced from live experience and are turning into elite disciplines, reserved solely for a narrow group of specialists. Therefore, we should aspire to specifying how the academic goals of music-related study can be reconciled with the mission of disseminating the culture of listening to music and understanding it.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The idea of interdisciplinary reflection on the experiencing of music should be promoted among scholars (musicologists and music philosophers).
References
Boden, M. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London, New York: Routledge.
Kivy, P. (2001). New Essays on Musical Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koelsch, S. (2012). Brain and Music. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Levinson, J. (1997). Music in the Moment. Cornell University Press.
Young, J.O. (2014). Critique of Pure Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sloboda, J. (1999). Poznanie, emocje i wykonanie. Trzy wykłady z psychologii muzyki. Warszawa: Akademia Muzyczna im. F. Chopina.
Sloboda, J. (2002). Umysł muzyczny. Poznawcza psychologia muzyki. Warszawa: Akademia Muzyczna im. F. Chopina.
Steiner, G. (1989). Real Presences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stróżewski, W. (2002). Wokół piękna. Szkice z estetyki. Kraków: Universitas.
Copyright (c) 2018 Anna Chęćka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The work will be simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND license, which permits others to share the work with proper credit given to the author and the original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in another journal), provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
We allow and encourage authors to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before and during the submission process, as this can foster beneficial exchanges and lead to earlier and increased citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following academic networking platforms:
