Challenges of overcoming ageism towards elderly people in healthcare context
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the paper is to analyse the impact ageism may have on providing healthcare to elderly people.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The article investigates the consequences of ageism in medical settings, where the elderly are particularly vulnerable to discrimination, distinguishing ageism from appropriate practice variation as well as giving suggestions to improve the situation. The paper analyses research published worldwide on selected issues connected with ageism with special attention to medical professionals’ attitudes and ageist behaviours of the elderly’s environment in a situation of their disability or illness.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: Firstly, the relation of ageism to other forms of stereotyping is outlined. Then, the threats of positive ageism are elaborated. The next section is devoted to self-stereotyping of the elderly and its impact on their functioning. Then, the paper discusses medical professionals’ attitudes and ways to measure them, as well as educational interventions that may alter them. Finally, the article refers effective ways of adjusting health promotion messages to the needs of older adults.
RESEARCH RESULTS: Ageism bases on mechanisms similar to sexism and racism, but there are some remarkable differences. Positive ageism may be compassionate, however, might be harmful when intruding into an elderly person’s decisions. Self-stereotyping may be described with a model of a vicious cycle. Contact with the elderly is found to be useful in changing medical staff’s attitudes. Family-centred messages are most effective when it comes to health promotion among older adults.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Studies on ageism prove that negative convictions about the elderly are harmful and affect their functioning. Inclusion of the elderly should be applied in social contexts as well as in science, as the elderly are often missed out in research samples.
References
Achenbaum, W.A. (2015). A history of ageism since 1969. Generations – Journal of the American Society of Aging, 39(3), 10‑16.
Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Oxford: Addison-Wesley.
Butler, R.N. (1969). Age-ism: another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9(4), 243‑246.
Butler, R.N. (1975). Why survive? Being old in America. New York: Harper and Row.
Bytheway, B. (2005). Ageism and age categorization. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 361‑374.
Chasteen, A.L., Bhattacharyya, S., Horhota, M., Tam, R., & Hasher, L. (2005).
How feelings of stereotype threat influence older adults’ memory performance. Experimental Aging Research 31(3), 235‑260. Retrieved from: https://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1751474/
Chonody, J.M. (2015). Addressing ageism in students: a systematic review of the pedagogical intervention literature. Educational Gerontology, 41, 859‑887.
Cronin, K. & Feuer, E. (2000). Cumulative cause-specific mortality for cancer patients
in the presence of other causes: a crude analogue of relative survival. Statistics in Medicine, 19(13), 1729‑1740.
Diederich, A., Winkelhage, J., & Wirsik, N. (2011). Age as a criterion for setting priorities in health care? A survey of the German public view. PLoS ONE, 6(8), 1‑10. Retrieved from: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/ journal.pone.0023930.
Extermann, M., Boler, I., Reich, R.R., Lyman, G.H., Brown, R.H., DeFelice, J., Levine, R. M., Lubiner, E.T., Reyes, P., Schreiber, F.J. et al. (2012). Predicting the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older patients: The Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients (CRASH) score. Cancer, 118(13), 3377‑3386.
Fiske, S., Cuddy, A., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype
content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878‑902.
Fowler, F.J.J., McNaughton Collins, M., Albersten, P.C., Zietman, A., Elliott, D.B., & Barry, M.J. (2000). Comparison of recommendations by urologist and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(24), 3217‑3222.
Hollar, D., Roberts, E., & Busby-Whitehead, J. (2011). COCOA: a new validated instrument to assess medical students’ attitudes towards older adults. Educational Gerontology, 37, 193‑209.
Hurria, A., Togawa, K., Mohile, S.G., Owusu, C., Klepin, H.D., Gross, C.P., Lichtman, S. M., Gajra, A., Bhatia, S., Katheria, V. et al. (2011). Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(25), 3457‑3465.
Iversen, T.N., Larsen, L., & Solem, P.E. (2009). A conceptual analysis of ageism. Nordic Psychology, 61(3), 4‑22.
Huang, Y.F., Liang, J., & Shyu, Y.I.L. (2014). Ageism perceived by the elderly in Taiwan following hip fracture. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 58, 30‑36.
Kagan, S. (2008). Ageism in cancer care. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 24(4), 246‑253.
Kane, R.L. & Kane, R.A. (2005). Ageism in healthcare and long-term care. Generations, 29(3), 49‑54.
Kang, S.K. & Chasteen, A.L. (2009). The moderating role of age-group identification
and perceived threat on stereotype threat among older adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 69(3), 201‑220.
Kaufmann, S. & Becker, G. (1986). Stroke: health care in the periphery. Social Science and Medicine, 22, 983‑989.
Kydd, A. & Fleming, A. (2015). Ageism and age discrimination in health care: fact or fiction? A narrative review of the literature. Maturitas, 81, 432‑438.
Levy, B.R. (2003). Mind matters: cognitive and physical effects of aging selfstereotypes. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 58(4), 203‑211.
Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b250/ec07f69b170d80b- 7693d9e80cdba2ac44641.pdf.
Lobo, A. (2011). Physical activity and health in the elderly. Bentham eBooks.
Retrieved from: https://ebooks.benthamscience.com/book/9781608051007/
Maxwell, A.J. & Sullivan, N. (1980). Attitudes toward the geriatric patient among family practice residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 28, 341‑345.
McGowan, T.G. (1996). Ageism and discrimination. In: V.W. Marshall, T.R. Cole, A. Svanborg, E.J. Masoro, K.W. Schaie, & J.E. Birren (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Gerontology: Age, Aging and the Aged. San Diego: Academic Press, 71‑80.
Muss, H.B., Berry, D.A., Cirrincione, C., Budman, D.R., Henderson, I.C., Citron, M.L., Norton, L., Winer, E.P., & Hudis, C.A. (2007). Toxicity of older and younger patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive threat cancer. The cancer and leukemia group B experience. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(24), 3699‑3704.
Nolan, L.C. (2011). Dimensions of aging and belonging for the older person and the effects of ageism. Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law, 25(2), 317‑339. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1451&context=jpl.
North, M.S. (2015). Ageism stakes its claim in the social sciences. Generations –
Journal of the American Society of Aging, 39(3), 29‑33.
Ory, M., Hoffman, M.K., Hawkins, M., Sanner, B., & Mockenhaupt, R. (2003).
Challenging aging stereotypes. Strategies for creating a more active society. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25(3), 164‑171.
Palmore, E.B. & Manton, K. (1973). Ageism compared to racism and sexism. Journal of Gerontology, 28, 363‑369.
Palmore, E.B. (1999). Ageism: negative and positive. New York: Springer Publishing.
Pedersen, A.D. & Mehlsen, M. (2011). Age-bias in staff appraisals of brain injury service provision? Nordic Psychology, 63(3), 25‑39.
Raposo, S. & Carstensen, L.L. (2015). Developing a research agenda to combat ageism. Generations – Journal of the American Society on Aging, 39(3), 79‑85.
Reuben, D.B., Lee, M., Davis, J.W., Eslami, M.S., Osterweil, D.G., Melchiore, S. & Weintraub, N.T. (1998). Development and validation of a geriatrics attitudes scale for primary care residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46(11), 1425‑1430.
Rosencranz, H.A. & McNevin, T.E. (1969). A factor analysis of attitudes toward the aged. Gerontologist, 9, 55‑59.
Rudd, A.G., Hoffman, A., Down, C., Pearson, M., & Lowe, D. (2007). Access to stroke care in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the effect of age, gender and weekend admission. Age and Ageing, 36(3), 247‑255. Retrieved from: https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article/36/3/247/40499.
Simkins, C.L. (2007). Ageism’s influence on health care delivery and nursing practice. Journal of Student Nursing Research, 1(1), 24‑28. Retrieved from:http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=josnr
Sohlberg, M.M. & Mateer, C.A. (2001). Cognitive rehabilitation. An integrative neuropsychological approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
Spencer, S.J., Steele, C.M., & Quinn, D.M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4‑28.
Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Diane_Quinn/publication/ 244301037_Stereotype_Threat_and_Women%27s_Math_Performance/links/0deec531f214c4f73a000000.pdf.
Stewart, T.J., Roberts, E., Eleazer, P., Boland, R., & Wieland, D. (2006). Reliability and validity issues for two common measures of medical students’ attitudes toward older adults. Educational Gerontology, 32, 409‑421.
Tornstam, L. (2006). The complexity of ageism. A proposed typology. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life 1, 43‑68. Retrieved from: http://www.ep.liu.se/ej/ijal/2006/v1/i1/a3/ijal06v1i1a3.pdf.
Copyright (c) 2018 Iwona Nowakowska
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The work will be simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND license, which permits others to share the work with proper credit given to the author and the original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in another journal), provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
We allow and encourage authors to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before and during the submission process, as this can foster beneficial exchanges and lead to earlier and increased citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following academic networking platforms: