Gender Differences in Educational Attainment: The Evidence from the European Union Countries
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to present the results of the analysis on diversity of the education attainment of women and men in the European Union countries. By implementing such a purpose, it is possible to present not only heterogeneity in education on the basis of gender but also disproportions between individual EU countries.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The article raises three important research problems: education, gender equality and diversification within the European Union countries. The analysis covers 28 EU countries and a period of 10 years: 2007 - 2016. The research method used in the paper is the analysis and criticism of the literature and taxonomic analysis using a set of diagnostic variables describing selected aspects of education.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The line of reasoning consists of three essential elements. The first part presents the problem of education with particular emphasis on gender gap according to international literature on the subject. The second part contains description of the research tools and methods. Part three of the article presents the results of the comparative study in the field of education of woman and man in the European Union members.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The research results are consistent with previous studies indicating that the level of education of women is higher than that of men. The level of diversity of education of women and men in individual EU countries is moderate. Among the most educated economies, the Scandinavian countries should be indicated.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This type of research can have significant useful value for shaping the education policy of women and men and other development policies. Considering the importance of education of women and men, there are definitely more possibilities of confronting the results of research with various areas of the economy.
References
Agarwal, B. (1992). The gender and environment debate: Lesson from India. Feminist Studies 18(1), 119.
Almeida, D. (1997). The Hidden Half: A History of Native American Women's Education. Harvard educational review 67(4), 757 – 771. doi:10.17763/haer.67.4.7142g172t1ql4g50
Becker, G.S. (1990). Ekonomiczna teoria zachowań ludzkich. Warszawa: PWN.
Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Beller, A.H. (1979). Occupational Segregation by Sex: Determinants and Changes. Journal of Human Resources, 17(3), 317–92.
Benham, L. (1974). Benefits of Women's Education within Marriage. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), 57-71.
Blau, F.D. (1977). Equal Pay in the Office. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Boserup, E. (2007). Woman’s Role in Economic Development. London: Cromwell Press.
Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2010). Long-term trends in educational inequality in Europe: Class inequalities and gender differences. European Sociological Review, 26, 31–48.
Deere, C.D. (1976). Rural Women's Subsistence Production in the Capitalist Periphery. Review of Radical Political Economy, 8(1), 9-17.
Duggan, L. (1994). Queering the state. Social Text, 39, 1-14.
Eurostat. (2016). Population by educational attainment level, sex and age (%) – Main indicators [Database]. Retrieved o February 20, 2018 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
Folbre, N. (1986). Cleaning House: New Perspectives on Households and Economic Development. Journal of Development Economics 22(1), 5-40.
Hek van, M. Kraaykamp, G, &Wolbers, M.H.J. (2016). Comparing the gender gap in educational attainment: The impact of emancipatory contexts in 33 cohorts across 33 countries. Education Research and Evaluation, 22(5-6), 260 – 282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1256222
Helbig, M. (2012). Do boys need male role models to be successful in school? Likelihood of the transition to academic track secondary school of girls and boys from nuclear families, single-mother or single-father families. Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 15, 597–614.
Hellwig, Z. (1967). Procedure of Evaluating High Manpower Data and Typology of Countries by Mean of Taxonomic Methods. Paris: UNESCO.
Hill, M.A. & King, E.M. (1993). Women’s education in developing countries: an overview In: King, E.M. & Hill, M.A. (eds), Women’s Education in Developing Countries: Barriers, Benefits, and Policies (1 - 50). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lucas, R.E. (2010). Wykłady z teorii wzrostu gospodarczego. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Łuczak, A. & Wysocki, F. (2013). Zastosowanie mediany przestrzennej Webera i metody TOPSIS w ujęciu pozycyjnym do konstrukcji syntetycznego miernika rozwoju. In K. Jajuga & M. Walesiak (red.), Taksonomia 20. Klasyfikacja i analiza danych – teoria i zastosowania. Wrocław: PN UE we Wrocławiu.
Maciejewski, M. (2017). Zróżnicowanie kondycji gospodarczej państw Unii Europejskiej. Studia Ekonomiczne, 319, 117 – 126.
Malina, A. (2004). Wielowymiarowa analiza przestrzennego zróżnicowania struktury gospodarki Polski według województw. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie.
OECD (2015). Education at a Glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pekkarinen, T. (2012). Gender Differences in Education. (Discussion Paper No. 6390). Retrived on March, 1 from: http://ftp.iza.org/dp6390.pdf
Pollak, R. A. (2003). Gary Becker's Contributions to Family and Household Economics. Review of Economics and Household, 1(1-2), 111 – 141.
Pujol, M.(1992). Feminism and Anti-Feminism in Early Economic Thought. Cheltenham/Brookfield: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sen, A. (1990). Gender and Cooperative Conflict. In: Tinker, I., (ed.), Persistent Inequality (123 – 148). Oxford: University Press Oxford.
Schultz, T. P. (1990). Returns to Women's Education (Center Discussion Paper, No. 603). Connecticut: Yale University.
Snyder T. D., & Dillow, S. A. (2011). Digest of educational statistics 2010. Washington, DC: National Center of Educational Statistics.
Wydymus, S. (1984). Metody wielowymiarowej analizy rozwoju społeczno – gospodarczego. Kraków: Zeszyty Naukowe, seria specjalna: monografie 62.
Zeliaś, A. (2000). Taksonomiczna analiza przestrzennego zróżnicowania poziomu życia w Polsce w ujęciu dynamicznym. Kraków: Wydawnictwo AE w Krakowie.
Copyright (c) 2019 Agnieszka Elżbieta Głodowska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The work will be simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND license, which permits others to share the work with proper credit given to the author and the original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in another journal), provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
We allow and encourage authors to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before and during the submission process, as this can foster beneficial exchanges and lead to earlier and increased citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following academic networking platforms:
