Implementation of Autonomy in Non-public Schools after 1989. The Perspective of Founders and Directors
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aims of the article are of three types: exploratory, descriptive, and explanatory. The exploratory aim includes striving to identify the basic facts related to the implementation of autonomy in non-public schools after 1989; the descriptive purpose includes an attempt to document the process of autonomy in non-public schools, and the explanatory objective includes developing and enriching theoretical explanations.
RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: In relation to the subject matter, the research question is: how did the process of implementing autonomy in non-public schools develop? The research used a qualitative strategy, and the tool used during the research was an interview with the founders and principals of Polish non-public schools.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: Non-public schools were being established in Poland after 1989 as a result of the political transformation. They were perceived as modern grassroots forms of education based on humanistic, democratic values. Autonomy was to be a tool and help in the fulfilment of those values and ideas.
RESEARCH RESULTS: In non-public schools, autonomy was a gradual process. To a large extent, the scope of autonomy and participation in decision-making processes first of all depended on the management units, such as the principal and the governing authority.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the founders and principals of schools, autonomy in Polish non-public schools was an important element in building the school community, although it was carried out by trial and error because there were no available models for implementing autonomy. In future, it would be worthwhile to undertake empirical research of Polish public schools in the field of exercising autonomy, and then to carry out comparative research in this area.
References
Berkowicz, A. (2019). Historia powstania krakowskich szkół niepublicznych. Kraków: Monografie i Studia Instytutu Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Didier, J. (1992). Słownik filozofii (K. Jarosz, Trans.). Książnica.
Dislen, G. (2011). Exploration of how students perceive autonomous learning in an EFL context. In D. Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 126-136). Zirve University.
Fik, M. (1989). Kultura polska po Jałcie. Kronika lat 1944-1981. Polonia Book Fund.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Frostenson, M. (2015). Three forms of professional autonomy: De-professionalisation of teachers in a new light. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2, 20-29.
Harhoff, F. (1986). Institution of autonomy. Nordic Journal of International Law, 55(1-2), 31-40.
Kiciński, K. (1992). Godność, punitywność, autonomia jednostki. In A. Pawełczyńska (Ed.), Wartości i ich przemian. Wydawnictwo Archidiecezji Warszawskiej.
Krąpiec, M.A. (1991). Ja – człowiek. Redakcja Wydawnictw KUL.
Kupisiewicz, C. & Kupisiewicz, M. (2009). Słownik pedagogiczny. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Lapidoth, R. (1997). Autonomy: Flexible solutions to ethnic conflicts. United States Institute of Peace.
MacKenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. Oxford University Press.
Motloba, P.D. (2018). Understanding of the principle of autonomy. South Africa Dental Journal,73(6), 418-420.
Nedelsky, J. (1989). Reconceiving autonomy: Sources, thoughts and possibilities, Yale Journal of Law and Feminisim, 1(7), 7-36.
Otręba, R. (2012). Sukces i autonomia w zarządzaniu organizacją szkolną. ABC a Wolters Kluwer business.
Popławska, A. (2021) Autonomia nauczyciela w reformowanej szkole. In A. Karpińska, M. Zińczuk & K. Kowalczuk (Eds.), Nauczyciel we współczesnej rzeczywistości edukacyjnej (s. 77-96). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
Radziewicz, J. (1993). Szkoła demokracji – demokracja w szkole. In J. Radziewicz (Ed.), Nauka demokracji ( s. 58-73) Centralny Ośrodek Doskonalenia Nauczycieli.
Raport o stanie oświaty w PRL (1973). Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Reber, A.S., & Reber, E.S. (2005). Słownik psychologii (B. Janasiewicz-Kruszyńska, Trans.). „Scholar”.
Smołalski, A. (1987). Koncepcja szkoły samorządnej i samoregulującej się. Edukacja. Studia. Ba- dania. Innowacje, 1(17), 7-18.
Sohn, L. (1980). The concept of autonomy in international law and the practice of the United Na- tions. Israel Law Review, 15(2), 180-190.
Śliwerski, B. (1998) Lęk wobec nauczycielskiej wolności. In W. Prokopiuk (Ed.), Rozwój nauczyciela w okresie transformacji. Białostockie Seminarium Pedeutologiczne (s. 111-120). Trans Humana.
Wysocka, M. (2008). Granice autonomii nauczyciela języków obcych i jego uczniów. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Autonomia w nauce języka obcego – co osiągnęliśmy i dokąd zmierzamy? (s. 13-19). Wydział Pedagogiczno-Artystyczny UAM w Poznaniu, Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Koninie.
Copyright (c) 2022 HORIZONS OF EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The work will be simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND license, which permits others to share the work with proper credit given to the author and the original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in another journal), provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
We allow and encourage authors to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before and during the submission process, as this can foster beneficial exchanges and lead to earlier and increased citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following academic networking platforms:
