From Seeing to Understanding: The Conceptual Metaphor UNDERSTANDING IS LIGHT in Julian of Norwich’s “Revelations of Divine Love”
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The article discusses the interplay between language, cognition and culture from a cognitive diachronic perspective, focusing on the relation between religion and metaphorical thought. It investigates the role of the conceptual metaphor UNDERSTANDING IS LIGHT in religious discourse, using the example of The Revelations of Divine Love, written by Julian of Norwich, a late medieval anchoress.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METODS: The paper draws on the Extended Conceptual Metaphor approach, Zoltán Kövecses’s elaboration of the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). The universalist bias of CMT means that the theory tends to ignore the sociocultural context of historical data, prioritising the influence of universal human embodiment on metaphorical thought. Using Kövecses’s approach, the paper shows how the gap in CMT methodology may be bridged to yield more reliable results.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The present study connects Kövecses’s approach to Cognitive Linguistic research into sociocultural situatedness. To exemplify the problem, the analysis examines the cognitive‑cultural underpinnings of Julian’s use of the metaphor UNDERSTAND‑ ING IS LIGHT.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The analysis shows that the metaphorical conceptualisation pattern may well derive from Julian’s sociocultural situatedness. The paper indicates that the anchoress’s metaphorical thought should be seen as embedded in the late medieval sociocultural context, rather than being considered solely in terms of universal aspects of embodiment.
CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE APPLICATIVE VALUE OF RESEARCH: The study concludes that the idea of sociocultural situatedness may be pivotal in the analyses of historical texts. It seems important to incorporate this idea into Kövecses’s approach, which may inform the methodology of cognitive diachronic research into metaphorical conceptualisations. Furthermore, the results may be applied to teaching students how to approach historical texts, helping them gain a better understanding of the relation between metaphorical thought and culture.
References
Baker, N.D. (1994). Julian of Norwich’s “Showings”: From vision to book. Princeton University Press.
Barsalou, L. (2016). Situated conceptualization: Theory and applications. In Y. Coello & M.H. Fischer (Eds.), Perceptual and emotional embodiment: Foundations of embodied cognition (Vol. 1; pp. 1–17). Routledge.
Cervone, C.M. (2012). Poetics of the incarnation: Middle English writing and the leap of love. University of Pennsylvania Press.
DesCamp, M., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Motivating biblical metaphors for God: Refining the cognitive model. In B. Howe & J. Green (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic explorations in biblical studies (pp. 7–24). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110350135.7
Dyas, D., Ellis, R., & Hutchinson, M. (2005). Useful terms for students. In D. Dyas, R. Ellis, & M. Hutchinson (Eds.), Approaching medieval English anchoritic and mystical texts (pp. 207–210). D.S. Brewer.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Ferrando, I. (2019). Metaphor analysis in discourse: Introduction. In I. Navarro & I. Ferrando (Eds.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp. 1–16). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110629460-001
Frank, R. (2008). Introduction: Sociocultural situatedness. In R. Frank, R. Roslyn, T. Dirven, E. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind: Vol. 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 1–20). De Gruyter Mouton.
Harbus, A. (2012). Cognitive approaches to Old English poetry. D.S. Brewer.
Geeraerts, D. (2015). Four guidelines for diachronic metaphor research. In J. Díaz‑Vera (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures (pp. 15–28). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335453.15
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor & R. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 153–180). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809305.153
Gillespie, V. (2013). The colours of contemplation: Less light on Julian of Norwich. In E. Jones (Ed.), The medieval mystical tradition in England (pp. 7–28). B.S. Brewer.
Gillespie, V., & Ross, M. (1992). The apophatic image: The poetics of effacement in Julian of Norwich. In M. Glasscoe (Ed.), Medieval mystical tradition in England (pp. 53–77). D.S. Brewer.
Gillespie, V., & Ross, M. (2004). “With mekeness aske perseverantly”: On reading Julian of Norwich. Mystics Quarterly, 30(3/4), 126–141. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20716485
Glasscoe, M. (2005). Contexts for teaching Julian of Norwich. In D. Dyas, V. Edden, & R. Ellis (Eds.), Approaching medieval English anchoritic and mystical texts (pp. 85–200). D.S. Brewer.
Grosseteste, R. (1942). De luce [On light] (C. Riedl, Trans.). Marquette University Press.
Hagen, S.K. (2004). The visual theology of Julian of Norwich. In F. Willaert (Ed.), Medieval memory: Image and text (pp. 145–60). Brepols.
Jenkins, N., & Watson, J. (Eds.). (2007). The writings of Julian of Norwich: A vision showed to a devout woman and a revelation of love. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Jindo, J. (2009). Toward a poetics of the biblical mind: Language, culture, and cognition. Vetus Testamentum, 59(2), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853309X406659
Julian of Norwich (1998). Revelations of divine love (E. Spearing, Trans.). Penguin.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
Kövecses, Z. (2022). The importance of context in CMT. In G. Kristiansen, K. Franco, S. De Pascale, L. Rosseel, & W. Zhang (Eds.), Cognitive sociolinguistics revisited (pp. 107–116). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733945-009
Kozłowska, A. (2023). Po co językoznawstwu badania nad literaturą? [Why should linguists study literature?]. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego, 79, 63–79. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.2617
Novotny, T. (2019). Julian of Norwich: How did she know what she knew? History of Education, 48(5), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2019.1606944
Palliser, M. (1992). Christ, our Mother of Mercy: Divine mercy and compassion in the theology of “The Shewings” of Julian of Norwich. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857146
Pollard, W., & Boening, R. (Eds.). (1997). Mysticism and spirituality in medieval England. D.S. Brewer.
Richardson, P., Mueller, M., & Pihlaja, S. (2021). Cognitive linguistics and religious language: An introduction. Routledge.
Sharifian, F. (2021). Cultural linguistics and religion. In H.-G. Wolf, D. Latić, & A. Finzel (Eds.), Cultural‑Linguistic explorations into spirituality, emotionality, and society (pp. 9–22). John Benjamins.
Trepczyński, M. (2017). Światło jako arché świata. Metafizyka światła Roberta Grosseteste [Light as the arché of the world: Robert Grosseteste’s metaphysics of light]. Ethos 30(119), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.12887/30-2017-3-119-07
Vereza, S., & Puente, R.L. (2017). Embodied cognition in “black metaphors”: The BAD IS DARK metaphor in biblical texts. Signo, Santa Cruz do Sul, 42(75). http://dx.doi.org/10.17058/signo.v42i75.9962
Copyright (c) 2023 HORIZONS OF EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The work will be simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND license, which permits others to share the work with proper credit given to the author and the original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in another journal), provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
We allow and encourage authors to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before and during the submission process, as this can foster beneficial exchanges and lead to earlier and increased citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following academic networking platforms:
