The Attitudes of Czech Teachers Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Schools

Keywords: artificial intelligence, chatbots, schools, teachers, readiness

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research study was to find out the subjective feelings of Czech teachers regarding the introduction of artificial intelligence into schools.

THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The following research questions follow from the research objective: Are Czech teachers worried about the introduction of artificial intelligence into schools? Do Czech teachers see artificial intelligence as a tool that will help them? Do Czech teachers have experience with the use of artificial intelligence? What experience do teachers have with artificial intelligence? To achieve the research objective and answer the research questions, the in-depth interview method with primary and secondary school teachers was used.

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The first part of the article discusses the concept of artificial intelligence. The second part discussed the use of artificial intelligence in Czech schools. The third part presents the results of a research study was to find out the subjective feelings of Czech teachers regarding the introduction of artificial intelligence into schools.

RESEARCH RESULTS: As part of the research, it was found that some teachers are concerned about the advent of artificial intelligence and its use in education, especially that students will “misuse” AI to cheat and plagiarize. Most teachers see the application of artificial intelligence in schools as inevitable and realize that it is their task to teach students to use AI effectively. Teachers are also aware that with the implementation of AI into schools, the teaching system will also have to change.

CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND APPLICABLE VALUE OF RESEARCH: We can expect that teachers will consider artificial intelligence as a tool that helps them and makes their work easier. A big impetus will be the integration of artificial intelligence into tools that teachers commonly work with, such as Office 365 or Google Workspace. 

References

Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., & Rockwell, G. (2021). Artificial Intelligence ethics guidelines for K-12 education: A review of the global landscape. In I. Roll, D. McNamara, S. Sosnovsky,R. Luckin, & V. Dimitrova (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in education. AIED 2021 (pp. 224–249).Springer.

Afzaal, M., Nouri, J., Zia, A., Papapetrou, U.F., Wu, Y., Li, X., & Weegar, R. (2021). Generation of automatic data-driven feedback to students using explainable machine learning. In I. Roll, D. McNamara, S. Sosnovsky, R. Luckin & V. Dimitrova (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in education. AIED 2021 (pp. 157–178). Springer.

Bédi, B., ChatGPT-4, Chiera, B., Chua, C., Cucchiarini, C., Ní Chiaráin, N., Rayner, M., Simonsen,A., & Zviel-Girshin, R. (2023). ChatGPT-Based learning and reading assistant: Initial report. https://doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.12715.82721

Belova, P. (2023). Способы автоматизации сравнительного анализа текстов при выявлении признаков плагиата в экспертизах по делам о нарушении авторских и смежных прав [Methods for automated comparative analysis of texts when detecting signs of plagiarism in expert case examinations of copyright and related rights infringement. Юрислингвистика [Legal Linguistics], 27, 94–98. https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2023)2717

Cejnarová, A. (2018). Umělá inteligence: v budoucnosti to bez ní nepůjde. Visions, 2, 8–9. https://www.visionsmag.cz/upload/visions-2-2018.pdf

Evropská komise. (2022). Etické pokyny pro využívání umělé inteligence a dat ve výuce a vzdělávání pro pedagogy. Úřad pro publikace Evropské unie. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/355

Gerrish, S. (2020). Jak myślą inteligentne maszyny (F. Fierek, Trans.). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Kaplan, J. (2019). Sztuczna inteligencja. Co każdy powinien wiedzieć (S. Szymański, Trans.). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Kopecký, K., Szotkowski, R., Voráč, D., Krejčí, V., & Dobešová, P. (2023). České školy a umělá inteligence – výzkumná zpráva. Pedagogická fakulta Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci, Centrum prevence rizikové virtuální komunikace.

Kurp, F. (2023). Sztuczna inteligencja od podstaw. Helion.

Ministerstvo průmyslu a obchodu. (2019). Národní strategie umělé inteligence v České republice.https://amps.cz/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Národní-strategie-umělé-inteligence-v-České-republice-ma_KORNBADHFXVN.pdf

NPI. (2023). Revize RVP EDU.CZ: Doporučení pro využívání umělé inteligence na základních a středních školách. https://revize.edu.cz/ke-stazeni#ai 2023

Spector, J.M., & Ma, S. (2019). Inquiry and critical thinking skills for the next generation: From artificial intelligence back to human intelligence. Smart Learning Environments, 6, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0088-z

Strauss, A., & Corbinová, J. (1999). Základy kvalitativního výzkumu. Albert.

Tłuczek, M. (2023). Jak sztuczna inteligencja zmieni twoje życie. Helion.

Vanian, J., & Leswing, K. (2023, March 13). ChatGPT and generative AI are booming, but the costs can be extraordinary. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/13/chatgpt-and-generative-ai-are-booming-but-at-a-very-expensive-price.html

Published
2024-03-29
How to Cite
Zormanová, L. (2024). The Attitudes of Czech Teachers Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Schools. HORIZONS OF EDUCATION, 23(65), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2024.2365.05