Students’ Attitudes Towards ChatGPT in Education
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to characterize students’ attitudes towards ChatGPT in education.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The main research question was: What are the attitudes of students towards ChatGPT in education? Moreover, an attempt was made to deter- mine how individual components of students’ attitudes (behavioral, cognitive, emotional) towards ChatGPT are differentiated by the type of studied field (social-humanistic vs. scientific). The diagnostic survey method was used. To collect the necessary data, an online questionnaire was used. The study involved 189 students aged 17 to 52 (M = 21.83, SD = 4.96).
THE PROCES OF ARGUMENTATION: The theoretical part of the text explains what artificial intelligence (AI) is and characterizes ChatGPT. Scientific works addressing the issues of opportunities and threats of using the language model in education were indicated. The empirical part presents the results of own research and conclusions.
RESEARCH RESULTS: Student attitudes towards ChatGPT vary. Nevertheless, students of sciences are definitely more positive than those of social and humanities, which is expressed in their beliefs about the tool and the dominant emotions. A positive attitude also signals the fact of testing the chatbot and the willingness to use it in the near future.
CONSULSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND APPLICABLE VALUE OF RESEARCH: It is worth teachers preparing for the fact that ChatGPT will be used by students and it would be good for them to learn how to use it. It is worth developing regulations specifying the extent to which students and teachers can use ChatGPT in education. It is also worth monitoring attitudes towards ChatGPT, because they will certainly change as knowledge and experience in using AI increases. The conduct- ed research can contribute to the analysis of educational behaviours among young people using AI.
References
Anagnostopulu, A. (2023, 21 stycznia). Dlaczego ChatGPT nie odróżnia prawdy od kłamstwa i czego możemy go nauczyć? Pytamy ekspertkę. Business Insider. https://businessinsider.com.pl/technologie/nowetechnologie/dlaczego-chat-gpt-nie-odroznia-prawdy-od-klamstwa-i-czego-mozemy-go-nauczyc/0vqm7s3
Arif, T.B., Munaf, U. i Ul-Haque, I. (2023). The future of medical education and research: Is ChatGPT a blessing or blight in disguise? Medical Education Online, 28(1), 2181052. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2181052
Bielecka, K. (2023, 19 kwietnia). AI dotarła na polskie uczelnie. Studenci przyznają: sypią się pierwsze piątki dla ChatuGPT. Wyborcza-biz. https://wyborcza.biz/biznes/7,177150,29663997,ai-dotarla-na-polskie-uczelnie-studenci-przyznaja-sypia-sie.html?disableRedirects=true
Biswas, S.S. (2023). Role of ChatGPT in public health. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 51, 868–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03172-7
BRIEF. (2023, 14 kwietnia). Google kontra Bing. Która wyszukiwarka jest lepsza? https://brief.pl/google-kontra-bing-ktora-wyszukiwarka-jest-lepsza
Carlbring, P., Hadjistavropoulos, H., Kleiboer, A. i Andersson, G. (2023). A new era in Internet interventions: The advent of Chat-GPT and AI-assisted therapist guidance. Internet Interventions, 32(1), 100621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2023.100621
Duszczyk, M. (2022, 29 grudnia). Studentka przyłapana na korzystaniu z ChatGPT. Jest sposób na oszustwa. Rzeczpospolita. https://cyfrowa.rp.pl/technologie/art37691461-studentka-przylapana-na-korzystaniu-z-chatgpt-jest-sposob-na-oszustwa
Emerline Team. (2024, 25 stycznia). How ChatGPT can benefit your business, and when it puts it at risk. Emerline. https://emerline.com/blog/chat-gpt-in-business
Gursoy, D., Li, Y. i Song, H. (2023). ChatGPT and the hospitality and tourism industry: An overview of current trends and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 32(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2023.2211993
Hong, W.C.H. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learning: opportunities in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 5(1), 37–45. https://jeti.thewsu.org/index.php/cieti/article/view/103
Hu, X., Tian, Y., Nagato, K., Nakao, M. i Liu, A. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT for design knowledge management. Procedia CIRP, 119, 21–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.001
Komunikat Komisji do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady Europejskiej, Rady, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów. Skoordynowany plan w sprawie sztucznej inteligencji. (2018, 7 grudnia). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0795&from=ES
Lu, Y., Wu, H., Qi, S. i Cheng, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence in intensive care medicine: Toward a ChatGPT/GPT-4 way? Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 51, 1898–1903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03234-w
Machura, M. (b.d.). ChatGPT w szkole. Szanse i zagrożenia. Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki, MEiNTech, Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych. https://samorzad.pap.pl/sites/default/files/2023-04/Chat_GPT%C2%A0w_szkole_szanse_i_zagrożenia.pdf
Michniuk, A., Pastwa, A. i Konieczna, P. (2014). Młodzi pedagodzy kontra „digital natives”. Kultura Popularna, 3(41), 114–119.
Nycz, A. (2022, 11 grudnia). ChatGPT – co to jest? Agencja Wrocławska. Blog. https://agencjawroclawska.pl/blog/chat-gpt-co-to-jest
Parlament Europejski. (2020, 4 września). Sztuczna inteligencja: co to jest i jakie ma zastosowania? https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/pl/headlines/society/20200827STO85804/
Rubacha, K. (2008). Metodologia badań nad edukacją. Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Sewastianowicz, M. (2023, 3 marca). Prof. Mazurek: Lepiej nie zakazywać korzystania ze sztucznej inteligencji, raczej uczyć dobrego jej wykorzystywania. Prawo.pl. https://www.prawo.pl/student/chatgpt-na-uczelniach-wywiad-z-prof-grzegorzem-mazurkiem,520060.html
Słownik języka polskiego. (b.d.). Sztuczna inteligencja. W: Słownik języka polskiego. Pobrano 27.11.2023 z https://sjp.pwn.pl/sjp/sztuczna-inteligencja;2466532.html
Stanek, A. (2023, 23 czerwca). Parlament Europejski przyjął akt o sztucznej inteligencji. https://www.pit.pl/aktualnosci/parlament-europejski-przyjal-akt-o-sztucznej-inteligencji-1008502
Staniszewski, O. (2023, 4 kwietnia). ChatGPT w obliczu prawa: istota prawnych regulacji chatów sztucznej inteligencji. PrawoSportowe.pl. https://prawosportowe.pl/a/chat-gpt-w-obliczu-prawa-istota-prawnych-regulacji-chatow-sztucznej-inteligencji
Stępień, J. (2023, 18 czerwca). ChatGPT a przyszłość edukacji. Wszystko co Najważniejsze. https://wszystkoconajwazniejsze.pl/jedrzej-stepien-chatgpt-przyszlosc-edukacji
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah Agyemang, M., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D.T., Huang, R. i Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(15), 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Tur, H. (2023, 14 lutego). ChatGPT – co to właściwie jest? Co potrafi? Czy jest się czego bać? PCWorld. https://www.pcworld.pl/news/ChatGPT-co-to-wlasciwie-jest-Co-potrafi-Czy-jest-sie-czego-bac,444004.html
Warszycki, M. (2019). Wykorzystanie sztucznej inteligencji do predykcji emocji konsumentów. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, 173, 11–121. https://doi.org/10.33119/SIP.2019.173.7
Vukovic, R. i Russell, D. (2023, 8 marca), ChatGPT: Education assessment, equity and policy. Teacher. https://www.teachermagazine.com/au_en/articles/chatgpt-education-assessment-equity-and-policy
Zanna, M.P. i Rempel, J.K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at on old concept. W: D. Bar-Tal, D. i Kruglanski, A.W (red.), The social psychology of knowledge (s. 315–334). Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2023 HORIZONS OF EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following reserach society portals:
