About the Path to the Real Autonomy of the Subject in a Critical-Reliable Current
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to explore the authority understanding in a perspective of Roy Bhaskar’s critical realism. In the proposed framework, authority ceases to be understood in terms of heteronomy or autonomy and emerges as a relational causal mechanism rooted in the ontological stratification of the human being.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The central research question is: In what way can authority be conceived as a relational causal mechanism that does not subjugate but enables self-knowledge and reflexivity? The study is theoretical and analytical in nature, employing the conceptual apparatus of critical realism, including the four ground social being.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The arguments lead toward an understanding of authority as an emergent relational mechanism embedded within the ontologically stratified structure of human existence. Its legitimation arises from the dynamic interplay of four interdependent orders of reality: the material, the social, the structural, and the personal. When the interrelation among these planes remains undisturbed, it deepens the understanding of authority as a relation of co-agency.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The analysis shows that authority grounded in external, heteronomous determinants may inhibit human development and constrain autonomy. Whereas, authority conceived as an emergent relational–causal mechanism restores agency to the subject. In this sense, relational authority does not dominate but potentializes others, contributing to their self-development and cognitive autonomy.
CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND APPLICABLE VALUE OF RESEARCH: Critical realism does not reject authority, but transforms it into a relational space of co-responsibility. Authority that is authentic and emancipatory can emerge at the level of the transcendental self. Such an authority takes on a relational form with others, relationship, that enables knowing and understanding important and complex issues. Authority, thus, becomes a relational mechanism of emancipation, co-creating a space of shared responsibility and mutual recognition.
References
Archer, M.S. (2015). Morfogeneza – ramy wyjaśniające realizmu. Uniwersyteckie Czasopismo Socjologiczne, 10, 16–46.
Bagley, C., Sawyerr, A. i Abubaker, M. (2016) Dialectic critical realism: Grounded values and reflexivity in social science research. Advances in Applied Sociology, 6(12), 400–419. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2016.612030
Bhaskar, R. (1986). Scientific realism and human emancipation. Routledge.
Bhaskar, R. (1993). Dialectic: The pulse of freedom. Verso.
Bhaskar, R. (2012). The philosophy of metaReality: Creativity, love and freedom. Routledge.
Bhaskar, R. (2020). Critical realism and the ontology of persons. Journal of Critical Realism, 19(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1734736
Buch-Hansen, H. i Nielsen, P. (2020). Critical realism: Basics and beyond. Red Globe Press.
Furedi, F. (2013). Authority: A sociological history. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/authority
Gorski, P.S. (2013). What is critical realism? And why should you care? Contemporary Sociology. A Journal of Reviews, 42(5), 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306113499533
Harrell, A. i Thye, S.R. (2018). Power and authority. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260331.ch63
Mariański, J. (2015). Autorytet moralny. In J. Mariański (red.), Leksykon socjologii moralności. Podstawy, teorie, badania, perspektywy (s. 36–39). Zakład Wydawniczy „Nomos”.
Parker, J. (2007). Subjectivity. W: M. Hartwig (red.), Dictionary of critical realism (s. 445–457). Routledge.
Potter, G. (2000). The philosophy of social science: New perspectives. Routledge.
Schwartz, M. (2015). MetaReality and the dynamic calling of the good. Journal of Critical Realism, 14(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1179/1476743015Z.00000000076
Scott, D. (2010). Education, epistemology and critical realism. Routledge.
Singh, S., Bhaskar, R. i Hartwig, M. (2020). Reality and its depths: A conversation between Savita Singh and Roy Bhaskar. Springer.
Stochmal, M. (2023). Krytyczny realizm Roya Bhaskara – basic critical realism. Uniwersyteckie Czasopismo Socjologiczne, 31(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.21697/ucs.2023.31.1.02
Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. Routledge.
Wielecki, K. (2024). Kultura versus kultura masowa. Podmiotowość i quasi-kultura w nibyspołeczeństwie. Narodowe Centrum Kultury.
Wielecki, K. i Smoluk-Stachowska, J. (2024). Wywiad z profesor Margaret Scotford Archer o jej życiu, pracy i wizji realizmu krytycznego (P. Wielecki, tłum.). Polish Journal of Critical Realism, 1, s. 11–16.
Copyright (c) 2025 HORIZONS OF EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The work will be simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND license, which permits others to share the work with proper credit given to the author and the original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in another journal), provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
We allow and encourage authors to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before and during the submission process, as this can foster beneficial exchanges and lead to earlier and increased citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following academic networking platforms:
