The role of the university in the development of entrepreneurial competencies according to the sustainability
Abstract
Summary
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to analyze the conditions and possibilities of using entrepreneurship education in higher education for the development of skills in support of sustainable development.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The development of entrepreneurial competencies is gaining an attention especially in the area of higher education because at this level of education, young people are prepared to enter the labor market, which can be shaped in line with the principles of sustainable development. The research design refers to the theoretical framework and conceptual research model. The used research methods are the method of analysis and logical construction as well as analysis of secondary data.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: First, the essence of entrepreneurship education and the importance of entrepreneurial competence as a goal of education will be presented. Then an attempt is made to conceptualize entrepreneurial competencies that support sustainable development in higher education.
RESEARCH RESULTS: This analysis will identify current directions and trends in the development of the field of entrepreneurship education within the context of sustainable development, as well as assessing the role of higher education in the development of entrepreneurial competencies to support sustainable development. Therefore, a conceptual model will be proposed, which is an attempt to conceptualize entrepreneurial competencies that contribute to meeting current challenges in the context of sustainable development.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Measures for entrepreneurship education undertaken by institutions of higher education can have a positive impact on the development of entrepreneurial competencies, that foster the sustainable development. For this purpose amendments in thinking and action are required. Among the variety of entrepreneurial competencies that support activities for sustainable development, e.g. innovativeness, interdisciplinarity, proactiveness can be mentioned.
References
Baartman, L.K.J., Bastiaens, T.J., Kirschner, P.A., i van der Vleuten, C.P.M. (2007). Evaluating assessment quality in competence‑based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 114-129.
Chmielecka, E. (2010). Autonomia programowa uczelni. Ramy kwalifikacji dla szkolnictwa wyższego. Warszawa: MNiSW.
Erpenbeck, J., i von Rosenstiel, L. (Hrsg.). (2003). Handbuch Kompetenzmessung. Erkennen, verstehen und bewerten von Kompetenzen in der betrieblichen, pädagogischen und sychologischen Praxis. Stuttgart: Schäffer‑Poeschel.
European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission, COM(2010) 2020 final.
European Commission. (2012). Proposal for a Council Recommendation on the validation of non‑formal and informal learning. Brussels: European Commission, COM(2012) 485 final, 05.09.2012.
European Commission. (2013). Entrepreneurship 2020 Action Plan: Reigniting the entrepreneurial spirit in Europe. Brussels: European Commission, COM(2012) 795 final.
European Communities. (2005). Proposal for a Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on key competences for lifelong learning. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, COM(2005) 548.
European Communities. (2007). The Key Competences for Lifelong Learning – A European Reference Framework. Luxembourg: European Communities, European Union. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning (2006/962/EC). Official Journal of the European Union, L 394.
Fayolle, A. (2007). Essay on the Nature of Entrepreneurship Education. Pozyskano z: http://www.kmu.unisg.ch/rencontres/RENC2006/Topics06/A/Rencontres_ 2006_Fayolle.pdf.
Fayolle, A., i Gailly, B. (2008). From craft to science: Teaching models and learning Processes in Entrepreneurship Education. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(7), 569-593. Pozyskano z: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090590810899838.
Fichter, K., Geier, J., i Tiemann, I. (2016). Good practice collection – University support for sustainable entrepreneurship. Berlin, Helsinki, Linköping: SHIFT. Pozyskano z: http://www.shift‑project.eu.
Gruber, M. (2007). Uncovering the value of planning in new venture creation: A process and contingency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), 782-807.
Hull, R.B., Kimmel, C., Robertson, D.P., i Mortimer, M. (2016). International field experiences promote professional development for sustainability leaders. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(1), 86-104.
Kapitulčinová, D., Dlouhá, J., Ryan, A., Dlouhý, J., Barton, A., Mader, M., Tilbury, D., Mula, I., Benayas, J., Alba, D., Mader, C., Michelsen, G., i Vintar M. (Eds.). (2015). Leading Practice Publication: Professional development of university educators on Education for Sustainable Development in European countries. Prague: Charles University in Prague.
Kuratko, D.F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 577-597.
Lackéus, M. (2014). An emotion based approach to assessing entrepreneurial education. International Journal of Management Education, 12(3), 374-396.
Lackéus, M. (2015). Entrepreneurship in Education: What, Why, When, How. Entrepreneurship360 Background paper. Paris: OECD.
Lans, T., Hulsink, W., Baert, H., i Mulder, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship Education and Training in a Small Business Context: Insights from the Competence‑Based Approach. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 16(4), 363-383.
Lourenço, F., Jones, O., i Jayawarna, D. (2013). Promoting sustainable development: The role of entrepreneurship education. International Small Business Journal, 31(8), 841-865.
Mwasalwiba, E.S. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: a review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Education + Training, 52(1), 20-47.
OECD. (2011). Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing.
PARP. (2011). Wzorce zrównoważonej produkcji (WZP) w działalności przedsiębiorstw – propozycja rozwiązań systemowych wspierających wdrażanie WZP w MSP. Warszawa: PARP 2011.
Pittaway, L., i Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship Education: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25, 479-510.
Poskrobko, B. (2013). Paradygmat zrównoważonego rozwoju jako wiodący kanon w badaniu nowych obszarów ekonomii. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 3(46), 10-24.
PRME (Principles for Responsible Management Education). (2015). Pozyskano z: http://www.unprme.org/participants/index.php.
Rasmussena, E.A., i Sørheimb R. (2006). Action‑based entrepreneurship education. Technovation, 26, 185-194.
Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable development (1987‑2005) – an oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13(4), 212-227.
Sánchez, J. (2013). The impact of an entrepreneurship education program on entrepreneurial competencies and intention. Journal of Small Business Management, 51, 447-465.
Segalas, J., Ferrer‑Balas, D., Svanstrom, M., Lundqvist, U., i Mulder, K.F. (2009).
What has to be learnt for sustainability? A comparison of bachelor engineering education competencies at three European universities. Sustainability Science, 4(1), 17-27.
Ull, M.A., Martínez Agut, M.P., Aznar, P., i Piñero, A (2010). Analysis of the introduction of sustainability in higher education in Europe: Institutional commitments and curriculum proposals. Revista EUREKA sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias. Monograph on Education for Sustainability, 7, 413-432.
UNESCO. (2012). ESD+TVET: promoting skills for sustainable development. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2014). Shaping the Future We Want. UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014), Final Report. Paris: UNESCO.
Unia Europejska. (2011). Opinia Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno‑Społecznego w sprawie „Kreatywność i przedsiębiorczość – mechanizmy wyjścia z kryzysu” (Dz.U. UE C 48/09 z 15.02.2011).
Urbaniec, M. (2010). Efekty międzynarodowej współpracy na rzecz rozwoju zrównoważonego na przykładzie szkolnictwa wyższego. W: T. Borys (red.), Edukacja dla zrównoważonego rozwoju. T. 1, Główne problemy. Białystok – Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Ekonomia i Środowisko, 178-189.
Urbaniec, M. (2014). Współczesne wyzwania edukacji na rzecz przedsiębiorczości w szkolnictwie wyższym. Horyzonty Wychowania, 13(26), 209-230.
Urbaniec, M. (2015). Sustainable Development Indicators in Poland: Measurement and System Evaluation. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(1), 119-134.
Wach, K. (2013). Edukacja na rzecz przedsiębiorczości wobec współczesnych wyzwań cywilizacyjno‑gospodarczych. Przedsiębiorczość – Edukacja, 9, 248-250.
Wach, K. (2014). Edukacja dla przedsiębiorczości: pomiędzy przedsiębiorczą pedagogiką a edukacją ekonomiczną i biznesową. Horyzonty Wychowania, 13(28), 11-32.
WCED (The World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WEF (World Economic Forum). (2011). Unlocking Entrepreneurial Capabilities to Meet the Global Challenges of the 21st Century: Final Report on the Entrepreneurship Education Workstream. World Economic Forum Global Education Initiative. Cologny/Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Will, M. (2008). Talking about the future within an SME?: Corporate foresight and the potential contributions to sustainable development. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 19(2), 234-242.
Willard, M., Wiedmeyer, C., Flint, R.W., Weedon, J.S., Woodward, R., Feldman, I., i Edwards, M. (2010). The sustainability professional: 2010 Competency Survey Report. International Society of Sustainability Professionals (ISSP).
Copyright (c) 2016 HORIZONS OF EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are asked to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). We advise to use any of the following reserach society portals:
