The new brave world of race? Interracial adoption and the issue of racial categorization
Abstrakt
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The main idea of the article about using race as an analytical tool is to demonstrate how race can be a salient factor in how people experience, inhabit the world and consequently family. Interracial adoption is discussed as a phenomenon which borrows from the particular fears and order of a society.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: the research problem concerns the question of how the concept of racial categorization can be understood in a racially mixed frame of reference relating to the experience of interracial adoption. The article uses the method of critical analyses as well as the analyses of the reference literature.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The first section of the article discusses race as a social construct, the second indicates white as the unmarked category and shows that the rest of racial categories is marked in contrast to whiteness. The third part provides justification for a thesis that in racial categorization, as in other social classifications, one category tends to dominate, usually taken for granted as normative, typical and most desirable. It causes social and parenting problems for the adoptive family.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The result of the argumentation is that race is often socially recognized as inherent and inherited quality that is seen to fit an adopted child for a specific social situation. Children are assigned to race categories based on assumptions about descent. Regardless of the fact, the phenomenon of interracial adoption exposes the fragility of conventional meanings of human races.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: the social acceptance of interracially adoptive families requires a society which does not define itself on the facts of blood and race allegiances, but on a set of deeply humanistic ideals.Bibliografia
Albański, Ł. (2014). Czy miłość nie rozróżnia kolorów: międzyrasowa adopcja w Kanadzie i Stanach Zjednoczonych. Wychowanie w rodzinie, 9, 41-47.
Albański, Ł. (2016). Interracial adoption. In C.L. Shehan (ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of family studies. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 1181-1186.
DOI: 10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs450.
Albański, Ł. & Krywult-Albańska, M. (2016). Adopcje międzynarodowe jako zaniedbany obszar badań nad migracjami. Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny, 3, 369-390.
Allen, T.W. (1994). The invention of the white race, volume 1: Racial oppression and social control. London: Verso.
Anthias, F. & Yuval-Davis, N. (1992). Racialised boundaries: Race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. London: Routledge.
Barn, R. (2013). ‘Doing the right thing’: transracial adoption in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36, 1273-1291. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2013.770543.
Bartholet, E. (1991). Where do Black children belong?: The politics of race matching in adoption. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 139, 1163-1256.
Bartholet, E. (1999). Nobody’s children: Abuse and neglect, foster drift, and the adoption alternative. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2013). Miłość na odległość. Modele życia w epoce globalnej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Bernstein, M. (2005). Identity politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 47-74.
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100054.
Bonilla-Silva, E. (1997). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 63, 465-480.
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Carney, S. (2011). The red market: On the trail of the world’s organ brokers, bone thieves, blood farmers, and child traffickers. New York, NY: William Morrow.
Delgado, R. & Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Desmond, M. & Emirbayer, M. (2009). What is racial domination? Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 6, 335-355.
Emirbayer, M. & Desmond, M. (2011). Race and reflexivity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35, 574-599. DOI:10.1080/01419870.2011.606910.
Feagin, J.R. (2006). Systemic racism: A theory of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.
Fredricson, G.M. (2003). Racism: A short history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Garfinkel, H. (2007). Studia z etnometodologii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Haney Lopez, I. (2007). A nation of minorities: Race, ethnicity, and reactionary colorblindness. Stanford Law Review, 59, 958-1063.
Harris, R. (2006). New ethnicities and language use. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hauskeller, C., Sturdy, S., Tutton, R., & Bliss, C. (2013). The marketization of identity politics. Sociology, 47, 1011-1025.
DOI: 10.1177/0038038513495604.
Hill, J. (2008). The everyday language of white racism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hollingsworth, L.D. (1997). Effect of transracial/transethnic adoption on children’s racial and ethnic identity and self-esteem. A meta-analytic review. Marriage
and Family Review, 25, 99-130.
Kendall, F. (2012). Understanding white privilege. Creating pathways to authentic relationships across race. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lee, R.M. (2003). The transracial adoption paradox: History, research, and counseling implications of cultural socialization. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 711-744.
Lewontin, R.C. (1972). The apportionment of human diversity. Evolutionary Biology, 6, 381-398.
Malott, K.M. & Schmidt, C.D. (2012). Counseling families formed by transracial adoption: Bridging the gap in the multicultural counseling competencies. The Family Journal, 20, 384-391.
McCall, R.B., van Ijzendoorn, M.H., Juffer, F., Groark, C.J., & Groza, V. (2011).
Children without permanent parents: Research, practice, and policy. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 76, 1-318.
Miranda Samuels, G.E. (2009). “Being raised by White people”: Navigating racial difference among adopted multiracial adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 80-94.
Mohanty, J., Keokse, G., & Sales, E. (2006). Family cultural socialization, ethnic identity, and self-esteem. Web-based survey of international adult adoptees.
Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 15, 153-172.
Park, S.M. & Green, C.E. (2000). Is transracial adoption in the best interests of ethnic minority children? Questions concerning legal and scientific interpretations of a child’s best interests. Adoption Quarterly, 3, 5-34. DOI: 10.1300/
J145v03n04_02.
Patton, S. (2000). Birth marks: Transracial adoption in contemporary America. New York: New York University Press.
Quiroz, P.A. (2007). Adoption in a color-blind society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Roth, W.D. (2016). The multiple dimensions of race. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39, 1310-1338. DOI:10.1080/01419870.2016.1140793.
Simmel, G. (1980). The stranger. In L.A. Coser (ed.), The pleasure of sociology. New York, NY: The New American Library, 235-240.
Smedley, A. (2007). Race in North America: Origin and evolution of a worldview.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press. The New Brave World of Race?
Templeton, A.R. (2007). Genetics and recent human evolution. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 61, 1507-1519. DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00164.x.
Tizzard, B. & Phoenix, E. (1989). Black identity and transracial adoption. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 15, 427-437.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Vonk, E.M., Lee, J., & Crolley-Simic, J. (2010). Cultural socialization practices in domestic and international transracial adoption. Adoption Quarterly, 13,227-247.
Zhang, Y. & Lee, G.R. (2010). Intercountry versus transracial adoption: Analysis of adoptive parents’ motivations and preferences in adoption. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 75-98.
Copyright (c) 2017 Horyzonty Wychowania
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Uwagi dotyczące praw autorskich
Autorzy publikujący w tym czasopiśmie wyrażają zgodę na następując warunki:
- Autorzy zachowują prawa autorskie, przyznając czasopismu prawo do pierwszej publikacji swojego tekstu jednocześnie zarejestrowanego pod numerem licencji CC BY-ND, która pozwala innym na korzystanie z tego tekstu z uznaniem autorstwa tekstu oraz pierwotnej publikacji w tym czasopiśmie.
- Autorzy proszeni są o nawiązywanie odrębnych, dodatkowych porozumień wynikających z umowy, dotyczących dystrybucji opublikowanej w czasopiśmie wersji tekstu nie na prawach wyłączności (np. opublikowanie go w repozytorium instytucji lub w innym czasopiśmie), z potwierdzeniem pierwszej publikacji w tym czasopiśmie.
Wyraża się zgodę i zachęca autorów do publikacji ich tekstu w Internecie (np. w repozytorium instytucji lub na jej stronie internetowej) przed lub podczas procesu składania tekstu jako, że może to prowadzić do korzystnych wymian oraz wcześniejszego i większego cytowania opublikowanego tekstu (Patrz The Effect of Open Access). Zalecamy wykorzystanie dowolnego portalu stowarzyszeń badawczych z niżej wymienionych:
