Human–Dog Interactions in Educational and Therapeutic Perspectives – Their Role in Stress Reduction
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the role of the human–dog relationship in experiencing stress and the coping strategies employed, as well as to identify personality variables that may influence the modification of these relationships.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEMS AND METHODS: The study was conducted with a group of 189 people aged 18 to 86 (M = 33.02; SD = 12.5), of whom 93 owned a dog and 96 did not have a pet. The survey method was used, utilizing psychometric tools such as: the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS- 10), the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), and the NEO-FFI Personality Inventory.
THE PROCESS OF THE ARGUMENTATION: Dog ownership is associated with a range of psychological benefits, such as reduced stress levels, improved well-being, and strengthened social bonds. Their presence in educational and therapeutic settings, particularly for individuals facing emotional difficulties, can have a significant impact on improving quality of life and learning efficiency.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The analysis of the results showed that dog ownership is associated with lower levels of stress and a preference for task-oriented coping styles. Dog owners also exhibited lower neuroticism and higher levels of extraversion and conscientiousness compared to non-dog owners. Additional analyses confirmed that neuroticism and agreeableness were significant predictors of stress levels in the context of the human–dog relationship.
CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND APPLICABLE VALUE OF RESEARCH: The findings highlight the significant role of the human–dog relationship in reducing stress and shaping effective coping strategies. These conclusions may be applied in interdisciplinary preventive and educational efforts, emphasizing the importance of animals in the context of well-being and public health.
References
Benefit Systems. (2023, 30 maja). Raport MultiSport Index 2023. https://biuroprasowe.benefitsystems.pl/244977-raport-multisport-index-2023
Bociarska, R., Krajewska-Kułak, E., Kułak-Bejda, A., Guzowski, A. i van Damme-Ostapowicz, K. (2024). Pies. Przyjaciel i terapeuta. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Białymstoku.
Brooks, H.L., Rushton, K., Lovell, K., Bee, P., Walker, L., Grant, L. i Rogers, A. (2018). The power of support from companion animals for people living with mental health problems: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence. BMC Psychiatry, 18, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1613-2
Cui, Y., Russell, M., Davern, M. i Christian, H. (2021). Longitudinal evidence of the impact of dog ownership and dog walking on mental health. Journal of Public Health, 43, e145–e152. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdz094
Enmarker, I., Hellzén, O., Ekker, K. i Berg, A.G.T. (2015). Depression in older cat and dog owners: The Nord Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT-3). Aging & Mental Health, 19(4), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.933310
Girczys-Połedniok, K., Pudlo, R., Szymlak, A. i Pasierb, N. (2014). Zastosowanie terapii z udziałem zwierząt w praktyce psychiatrycznej. Psychiatria, 11(3), 171–176. https://journals.viamedica.pl/psychiatria/article/view/40405
Gonzatti, V., Oliveira, C., Alminhana, L., Hausen, D., Schütz, D., Costa, B.D., Trevizan, L., Argimon, I. i Irigaray, T. (2022). Personality factors, depression, anxiety, and stress in pet owners. Psico, 52, e35289. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2021.4.35289
Junça-Silva, A. (2022). Friends with benefits: The positive consequences of pet-friendly practices for workers’ well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031069
Kogan, L.R., Currin-McCulloch, J., Bussolari, C., Packman, W. i Erdman, P. (2021). The psychosocial influence of companion animals on positive and negative affect during the COVID-19 pandemic. Animals, 11, 2084, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072084
Liu, H., Lin, J. i Lin, W. (2024). Cognitive mechanisms and neurological foundations of companion animals’ role in enhancing human psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1354220, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1354220
Luo, J., Zhang, B., Cao, M. i Roberts, B.W. (2023). The stressful personality: A meta-analytical review of the relation between personality and stress. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(2), 128–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221104002
Mamzer, H. (2015). Stary człowiek i pies. Horyzonty Wychowania, 14(32), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.17399//HW.2015.143203
Pervin, A.L. i John, O.P. (2002). Osobowość. Teoria i badania. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Polheber, J.P. i Matchock, R.L. (2014). The presence of a dog attenuates cortisol and heart rate in the Trier Social Stress Test compared to human friends. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37(5), 860–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-013-9546-1
Rode, B. (2015). Przegląd najnowszych badań dotyczących dobrostanu i zachowania się psów. Życie Weterynaryjne, 90(10), 657–660.
Schwarzmüller-Erber, G., Maier, M., Stummer, H. i Kundi, M. (2021). Recreational horseback riding and its association with physical, mental, and social well-being and perceived health. Anthrozoös, 34, 685–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2021.1926709
Trammell, J.P. (2017). The effect of therapy dogs on exam stress and memory. Anthrozoös, 30, 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2017.1370244
Zhou, Z., Yin, D. i Gao, Q. (2020). Sense of presence and subjective well-being in online pet watching: The moderation role of loneliness and perceived stress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 9093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239093
Copyright (c) 2025 HORIZONS OF EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The work will be simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND license, which permits others to share the work with proper credit given to the author and the original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in another journal), provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
We allow and encourage authors to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before and during the submission process, as this can foster beneficial exchanges and lead to earlier and increased citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following academic networking platforms:
