Stereotypical Images of Ukrainians and Russians in a HumanitarianCrisis: Multicultural Perspectives

Agnieszka Szewczyk - Zakrzewska; Stanislav Avsec

doi:10.35765/hw.2023.2261.11

Agnieszka Szewczyk - Zakrzewska Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-8267
Prof. Dr. University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0487-8115

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2023.2261.11

Keywords: stereotypes, Ukrainians, Russians, multicultural perspective, adjective check list

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This article aims to map the stereotypical image of Ukrainians and Russians from a cross-cultural perspective in the context of the ongoing armed conflict.

RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The research problem concerns the cultural differences that are revealed in the perception of representatives of the two nationalities that are involved in the armed conflict. Since stereotypical judgements are most often revealed in language, an adjective check list was used for the study. A sample of 92 Polish and Slovenian students took part in the study. The collected linguistic material was used to analyse and compare cross-cultural stereotypical judgements about Ukrainian and Russian citizens.

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The argument begins with theoretical perspectives on the concept of stereotyping and the process of stereotyping. The role of language in the stereotyping process is analysed. An analysis of the results and conclusions is presented.

RESEARCHRESULTS: In general, Polish students attribute fewer positive adjectives than Slovenian students to both Ukrainians and Russians. The analysis revealed significant statistical differences as well as similarities between the researched groups of Polish and Slovenian students in terms of the stereotypical image of Ukrainians and Russians.

CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS: Empirical evidence shows that Polish and Slovenian students have more in common in their perception of Russians, while they perceive Ukrainians quite differently. The linguistic characteristics obtained in this study provide a general insight into the perceptions of the two nationalities involved in the war. It should also be noted that these characteristics of Ukrainians and Russians may constitute socially important knowledge on the negative stereotypes about these nationalities. This knowledge may be useful in challenging counteracting or disseminating such judgements, which may be harmful and lead to prejudice or discrimination against people from the nationalities studied.

Author Biography

Prof. Dr., University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Stanislav Avsec received a BSc degree in mechanical engineering, an MSc degree in economics and a PhD degree in technology education, all from the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. He works as an associate professor of teaching and learning strategies in technology and engineering education in the Faculty of Education at the University of Ljubljana. He is the Head of the Department of Technology Education at the Faculty of Education. He is an active researcher in technology and engineering education, educational technology, creativity and inventiveness, architecture, and in environmental science and management. He is a member of editorial advisory boards and a reviewer for several journals in the area of technology and engineering education, cognitive science, educational technology, architectural education, environmental management and engineering. In September 2019, he was elected Fellow of the World Institute for Engineering and Technology Education (WIETE).

References

Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.

Ashmore, R.D., & Del Boca, F.K. (1981). Conceptual approaches to stereotype and stereotyping. In D.L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive process in stereotyping and intergroup behaviour (pp. 1-36). Erlbaum.

CBOS. (2022, August). Komunikat z badań. Polacy wobec wojny na Ukrainie i ukraińskich uchodźców. https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2022/K_101_22.PDF

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Craig, R.J. (2005). Assessing personality and mood with adjective check list methodology: A review. International Journal of Testing, 5(3), 177-196.

Eurobarometer. (2022a). EU’s response to the war in Ukraine, https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2772

Eurobarometer. (2022b). Summer Eurobarometer 2022, https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2693

Gough, H.G., & Heilbrun, A.B. (1983). The adjective check list manual. Consulting Psychologists Press.

Hamilton, D.L., & Trolier, T.K. (1986). Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In J.F. Dovidio & S.L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 127- 163). Academic Press.

Karolczuk, M. (2021). Obraz Rosjan, Białorusinów i Ukraińców w języku polskich studentów jako potencjalny wyznacznik relacji ze wschodnimi sąsiadami. Roczniki Humanistyczne, 69(6), 87-100.

Lippmann, W. (2023, January 28). Public Opinion. (Original work published 1921). https://wps.pearsoskiencustom.com/wps/media/objects/2429/2487430/pdfs/lippmann.pdf

MacFarland, T.W. (2012). Two-way analysis of variance. Statistical tests and graphics using R. Springer.

Macrae, C.N., Stangor, Ch., & Hewstone, M. (1999).Stereotypy i uprzedzenia (M. Majchrzak et al., Trans.). Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Mininni, G. (1982). Psicosemiotica. Adriatica Editrice.

Nelson, T.D. (2003). Psychologia uprzedzeń (A. Nowak, Trans.). Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Rodziewicz, B. (2019). Konceptualizacja pojęć zdrowie i здоровье jako wartości w świetle badań empirycznych (ujęcie psycholingwistyczne). Roczniki Humanistyczne, 67(7), 63-77.

Wu, M.-J., Zhao, K., & Fils-Aime, F. (2022). Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human BehaviourReports, 7, 100206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206