The Image of Incriminated Masculinity in Crime Narratives - A Hegemonic Approach

Keywords: forensic linguistics, criminology, crime narratives, masculinity, hegemonic masculinity

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to characterize the portrayal of incriminated masculinity in crime narratives.

THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: Three narrative tendencies creating the image of masculinity were identified through a review and analysis of English-language academic literature on crime narratives. The characteristics of masculinity were examined in reference to the theory of hegemonic masculinity.

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The concept of hegemonic masculinity was first defined, followed by a discussion of the specifics of the research material. Subsequently, three narrative tendencies were identified and described.

RESEARCH RESULTS: Three narrative tendencies were identified and labeled: (1) criminality as a determinant of masculine success, (2) male dominance as a central element of the criminal act, and (3) the heroic myth as a mitigating circumstance.

CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND APPLICABLE VALUE OF RESEARCH: The narrative portrayal of incriminated masculinity is strongly influenced by the model of hegemonic masculinity. This pattern is often used to promote criminal actions or to influence the legal realities faced by narrators or protagonists. It seems necessary to emphasize the importance of lawfulness and respect for legal norms in the process of educating young men about masculinity.

References

Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. Routledge.

Bennett, L., & Feldman, M.S. (1981). Reconstructing reality in the courtroom. Tavistock.

Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C.J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12134

Connell, R.W. (1995). Masculinities. Allen and Unwin.

Connell, R.W. (2012). Masculinity research and global change. Masculinity and Social Change, 1(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.4471/mcs.2012.01

Cotterill, J. (2003). Language and power: A linguistic analysis of the O.J. Simpson trial. Palgrave Macmillan.

Elliott, K. (2015). Caring masculinities: Theorizing an emerging concept. Men and Masculinities, 19(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X15576203

Gębka-Wolak, M. (2017). Językoznawstwo sądowe w Polsce. Obszary zainteresowania i zastosowanie [Forensic linguistics in Poland: Areas of interest and application]. Kwartalnik Sądowy Apelacji Gdańskiej, 3, 9–29. https://repozytorium.umk.pl/handle/item/4935

Grzyb, M., & Habzda-Siwek, E. (2013). Płeć a przestępczość. O problemie dysproporcji płci wśród sprawców przestępstw z użyciem przemocy [Gender and crime: On the problem of gender disparity among perpetrators of violent crimes]. Archiwum Kryminologii, 35, 95–135. https://doi.org/10.7420/AK2013D

Harris, S. (2005). Telling stories and giving evidence: The hybridisation of narrative and non-narrative modes of discourse in a sexual assault trial. In J. Thornborrow & J. Coates (Eds.), The sociolinguistics of narrative (pp. 215–238). John Benjamins.

Heffer, C. (2021). Narrative in the trial: Constructing crime stories in court. In M. Coulthard, A. May & R. Sousa-Silva (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 192–210). Routledge.

Kimmel, M. (1995). The politics of manhood: Profeminist men respond to the mythopoetic men’s movement (and the mythopoetic leaders answer). Temple University Press.

Kluczyńska, U. (2021). Męskości hybrydowe, czyli wilk w owczej skórze. Definiowanie konceptu [Hybrid masculinities, or a wolf in sheep’s clothing: Defining the concept]. Przegląd Krytyczny, 3(2), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.14746/pk.2021.3.2.2

Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Melosik, Z. (2021). Męskość hegemoniczna: teoria i społeczne konstruowanie przestępstwa [Hegemonic masculinity: Theory and the social construction of crime]. Resocjalizacja Polska, 21, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.22432/pjsr.2021.21.02

Messerschmidt, J.W., & Tomsen, S. (2016). Masculinities, crime, and criminal justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Oxford handbooks online (pp. 1–23). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935383.013.129

Skrinjar, M., & Pettersson, T. (2020). Underdogs, rebels, and heroes: Crime narratives as a resource for doing masculinity in autobiographies. Sociologisk Forskning, 57(3–4), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.57.20241

Walsh, A., & Hemmens, C. (2008). Introduction to criminology: A text/reader. Sage.

Wojnicka, K. (2021). Men and masculinities in times of crisis: Between care and protection. NORMA, 16(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2021.1885860

Wyrwas, K. (2014). Opowiadania potoczne w świetle genologii lingwistycznej [Everyday storytelling in light of linguistic genre theory]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.

Youngs, D., & Canter, D. (2011). Narrative roles in criminal action: An integrative framework for differentiating offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02011.x

Published
2025-06-30
How to Cite
Pankalla, O. (2025). The Image of Incriminated Masculinity in Crime Narratives - A Hegemonic Approach. HORIZONS OF EDUCATION, 24(70), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2025.2470.09