Representations of Masculinity in Polish Neoseries. Some Critical Remarks on the Discursive Strategies and Values
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of the article is to identify and describe the models of masculinity present in Polish neoseries and to analyze the discursive strategies used in their creation.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The main research problem concerns the ways in which male images in neoseries are constructed in axiological terms. The adopted research orientation is related to Critical Discourse Analysis, with particular emphasis on tools characteristic of the Discursive-Historical Approach.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The focus was put on the analysis of seven neoseries produced in the third decade of the 21st century, but the article also includes numerous references to many other neoseries. The characters selected for analysis exemplify various models of masculinity. The theoretical framework for the research is provided by theories developed within Critical Studies on Men and Masculinities.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The Polish neoseries feature a continuum of diverse models of men: from hegemonic masculinity through hybrid masculinities to inclusive masculinities. In many neoseries, the most important values embraced by men are: power, dominance, and competition. Positive portrayals of men who fit into the category of caring masculinities are very few.
CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND APPLICABLE VALUE OF THE RESEARCH: On the one hand, the Polish neoseries are compelling cultural texts, as they often boldly address important social issues. On the other hand, they can be considered potentially axiologically dangerous, as they employ a strategy of moral relativism in character construction.
References
Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. Routledge.
Arcimowicz, K. (2020). Oblicza męskości w neoserialach. Hegemonia – kontaminacja – inkluzja. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
Arcimowicz, K. (2023). Rzecz o neoserialach – co badać i jak badać? Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia de Cultura, 15(1), 17–30.
Baza Filmwebu. Wortal Filmweb.pl. https://www.filmweb.pl/search#/serialpage=1&start+Year=2005&endYear=2025
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Męska dominacja (tłum. L. Kopciewicz). Oficyna Naukowa.
Bridges, T. i Pascoe, C.J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8(3), 246–258.
Connell, R.W. (2005). Masculinities. University of California Press.
Connell, R.W. i Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity. Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(6), 829–859.
Elliott, K. (2016). Caring masculinities: Theorizing an emerging concept. Men and Masculinities, 19(3), 240–259. Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. Harper & Row.
Kaja, E. (2014), Amerykańskie seriale typu „post-soap opera” – nowa generacja seriali telewizyjnych, lecz nie tylko w telewizji. Kultura i Edukacja, 2, 64–82.
Kimmel, M. (1992). Foreword. W: S. Craig (red.), Men, masculinity and the media (s. XI–XII). Sage Publications.
Łaciak, B., (2013). Kwestie społeczne w polskich serialach obyczajowych – prezentacje i odbiór. Analiza socjologiczna. Wydawnictwo Akademickie Żak.
Łuczaj, K. (2013). Zmieniająca się rodzina w zmieniającym się serialu. IntereAlia. Pismo poświęcone studiom queer, 8, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.51897/interalia/TVYO1695
Reisigl, M. (2020). The discourse-historical approach. W: J. Flowerdew i J.E. Richardson (red.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (s. 44–59). Routledge.
Reisigl, M. i Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). W: R. Wodak i M. Meyer (red.), Methods of critical discourse studies (s. 23–61). Sage.
Sobota, J. (2016). Bohater rozdarty – współczesne seriale jako obszar symulacji dylematów etycznych. W: M. Cichmińska, A. Krawczyk-Łaskarzewska i P. Przytuła (red.), Seriale w kontekście kulturowym. Serialowe sedno (s. 15–26). Instytut Filologii Polskiej Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie.
Wodak, R. i Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. W: R. Wodak i M. Meyer (red.), Methods of critical discourse studies (s. 1–33). Sage.
Copyright (c) 2026 HORIZONS OF EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The work will be simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND license, which permits others to share the work with proper credit given to the author and the original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in another journal), provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
We allow and encourage authors to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before and during the submission process, as this can foster beneficial exchanges and lead to earlier and increased citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following academic networking platforms:
