The Child’s Right to Co- and Self-determination: A Comparative Legal Analysis
Abstract
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to present a comparative analysis of selected European countries’ legal regulations for issues concerning a child’s right to co- and self-determination when those who care for them (under parental responsibility, custody, legal guardianship, etc.) make decisions about their personal life.
THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The research problem concerns whether a child can co-decide or independently make decisions in matters concerning their person or property and, if so, what the scope of this right is. In investigating these questions, the authors used the theoretical and dogmatic legal method as well as the method of analysis (and synthesis) of relevant legal provisions of selected European countries.
THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: In their analysis of the provisions in force in the in- ternal legislation of selected European countries (Germany, Norway, Poland, Sweden and the Netherlands), the authors present the adopted legal solutions for regulating issues related to rights that a child is entitled to when making decisions about their personal life and the responsibilities of parents caring for a child.
RESEARCH RESULTS: The legislation of each of the five selected countries gives a child under the care of parents the right to co-determination/self-determination when making decisions about their personal life, although there are noticeable differences between individual national systems.
CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to the editorial limitations on the length of the article, the authors have limited the analysis to the legislation of five selected European countries and to a general analysis of national laws regulating the research problem. In the longer term, a more in-depth analysis of such provisions seems justified. It also would be interesting to analyze the legal solutions in force in other countries, both European and non-European.
References
Act No. 7 of 8 April 1981 relating to Children and Parents. (Lov om barn og foreldre 1981 (barnelo- va)). http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/bld/Documents/Laws-and-rules.html.id=276069
Borysiak, W. (2016). Komentarz do Artykułu 72 Konstytucji RP. In: M. Safjan, & L. Bosek (Eds.). Konstytucja RP. Tom I. Komentarz do art. 1-86. C.H. Beck, Legalis.
Bruning M.R., & Bolscher K.G.A. (2020). Juridische analyse van de procespositie en het hoorrecht van minder- jarigen. In: M.R. Bruning, D.J.H. Smeets, K.G.A. Bolscher, J.S. Peper, & R. de Boer, Kind in proces: van communicatie naar effectieve participatie. Wolf Legal Publishers.
Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG), Urteil des ersten Senats (Judgement) 15.02.2006 – BvR 357/05.
Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG), Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht (FamRZ) 2005, 1057.
Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG), Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht (FamRZ) 2007, 1078.
Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG), Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht (FamRZ) 2007, 105.
Civil Code of the Netherlands (1992). http://www.dutchcivillaw.com/civilcodebook077.html
Convention on the Rights of the Child of 20 November 1989. 1577 U.N.T.S. 3 (1989). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child CRC/C.NLD/CO/5-6 Committee on the Rights of Children – Concluding observations on the com- bined fifth and sixth periodic reports of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, March 2022.
Deutscher Bundestag – 19. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 19/28138, 7.
Dutch General Administrative Law Act (2013). https://www.acm.nl/sites/default/files/old_publication/ publicaties/15446_dutch-general-administrative-law-act.pdf
Dutch Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide Act (2001). https://wfrtds.org/ dutch-law-on-termination-of-life-on-request-and-assisted-suicide-complete-text/.
ECLI:NL: RBMID:2001:AD5479. https://www.uitspraken.nl/uitspraak/rechtbank-middelburg/ bestuursrecht/socialezekerheidsrecht/voorlopige-voorziening/ecli-nl-rbmid-2001-ad5479
ECLI:NL: CRVB:2012:BW6529. https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:CRVB:2012:BW6529
ECLI:NL: RBNHO: 2017:3955. https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RB NHO:2017:3955
Gajda J. (2021). Komentarz do Artykułu 95 KRO. In: K. Pietrzykowski (Ed.), Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy. Komentarz. C.H. Beck, Legalis.
Gromada, A., Rees, G., & Chzhen, Y. (2020). Worlds of Influence – Understanding What Shapes Child Well-being in Rich Countries. Innocenti Report Card 16. UNICEF.
Haak, H., & Haak-Trzuskawska A. (2019). Pokrewieństwo i powinowactwo (pochodzenie dziecka, stosunki między rodzicami a dziećmi, przysposobienie). Komentarz do art. 617-127 KRO oraz związanych z nimi regulacji KPC (art. 453-458, 579-589).C.H. Beck, Legalis.
Jänterä-Jareborg, M., Brattström, M. (2021). Parental Responsibilities. National Report. Update: Sweden. Downloaded from: NATIONAL REPORT UPDATE: SWEDEN (ceflonline.net).
Jänterä-Jareborg, M., Singer, A., & Sörgjerd, C. (n.d.). Parental Responsibilities. National Report: Sweden. NATIONAL REPORT: SWEDEN. http://ceflonline.net/wp-content/uploads/Sweden-Parental-Responsibilities.pdf
Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r. (the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of April 2, 1997). (1997). Dz.U. Nr 78, poz. 483.
Madriñán, C.M. (2019). The child’s path to international justice. Journal of Human Rights and Peace Studies, 5(1), 1-35.
Oberlandesgericht (OLG) Brandenburg, Beschluß (Decision) 07.08.2015 – 9 UF 8/15.
Prucnal-Wójcik, M. (2021). Porozwodowe porozumienia rodzicielskie – analiza prawnoporównawcza. Horyzonty Wychowania, 20(54), 11-21.
Słyk, J. (2022). Komentarz do Artykułu 95 KRO. In: M. Domański & J. Słyk (Eds.). Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy. Komentarz. C.H. Beck, Legalis.
The Children and Parents Code of 1949 (1949: 381). (Föräldrabalk (1949: 381)). Svensk författ- ningssamling 1949:1949:381 t.o.m. SFS 2022:966 – Riksdagen; lagrummet.se – startsida; International Commission of Jurists (icj.org).
The Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (2018). https://www.government.nl/documents/ reports/2019/02/28/the-constitution-of-the-kingdom-of-the-netherlands.
Ustawa z dnia 25 lutego 1964 roku – Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy (the Family and Guardianship
Code of February 25, 1964). (1964). Dz. U. z 2020 r., poz. 1359.
Copyright (c) 2022 HORIZONS OF EDUCATION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The work will be simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-ND license, which permits others to share the work with proper credit given to the author and the original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in another journal), provided that the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
We allow and encourage authors to share their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before and during the submission process, as this can foster beneficial exchanges and lead to earlier and increased citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following academic networking platforms:
