The Research Process in Crtical-Participative- ‑Educational Action Research – Reconnaissance and Dynamic Action Cycles

Keywords: CPAR M2S, research reconnaissance, dynamic action cycles, action spirals, research community

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: Deeper learning and explaining the essence of the research process in critical-participatory-educational action research, taking into account research reconnaissance and dynamic action cycles; they constitute research stages based on the interpretative paradigm and the tradition of participatory research.

THE RESEARCH PROBLEMS AND METHODS: The article focuses on the understanding of CPAR M2S and its role in the process of creating knowledge and improving practice; the article uses a discursive analysis of understanding and explaining the research process in the tradition of participatory research, originating from the actionist movement for community development.

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The content of the article explains the stages of the process of research inquiry that does not take into account the rigid canons of methodological-positivist inquiries and does not fit into the category of so-called “applied research.”

RESEARCH RESULTS: The CPAR is not technical and instrumental improvement of educational practice; it cannot be unreflectively identified only with an educational (didactic) project; the main differentiating element is the identification of the research problem by the group of respondents (not at the command of the management); the educational space becomes a place where knowledge about practice is generated and teachers are critically reflective of their actions (practice) so far, aimed at change.

CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The article takes into account the aspect of variability and research dynamism present in action research and describes the role of a researcher of action, educational „moments” bringing new directions of thinking and action in order to create knowledge and improve practice.

References

Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Open University Press.

Grundy, P. (1995). Action research as professional development. Occasional paper #1. Murdoch University.

Johnson, A.P. 2002. A short guide to action research. Allyn & Bacon.

Kemmis, S. i McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (wyd. 3). Deakin University Press.

Maxwell, T.W. (2001). Reconnaissance. EDST 390 Class Notes.

Maxwell, T.W. (2003). Action research for Bhutan?, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279948945_Action_Research_for_Bhutan

McTaggart, R. (1994). Participatory action research: Issues in theory and practice. Educational Action Research, 2(3), 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079940020302

Mendel, M. (2013). Edukacyjna podróż w biografii jako badanie w działaniu. W: H. Červinková i B.D. Gołębniak (red.), Edukacyjne badania w działaniu (s. 127-175). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Nowak-Łojewska, A. (2021). Action Research w praktyce. Nauczycielskie refleksje „w” działaniu i „nad” działaniami autorskimi. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.

Radlińska, H. (1935). Stosunek wychowawcy do środowiska społecznego. Szkice z pedagogiki społecznej. Nasza Księgarnia.

Sagor, R. (2011). Badanie przez działanie. Jak wspólnie badać, żeby lepiej uczyć (K. Kruszewski, tłum.). Civitas, Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej.

Schon, D.A. (1995). Knowing‑in‑action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, 27(6), 27-34.

Smolińska-Theiss, B., & Theiss, W. (2013). Badanie i działanie w pedagogice społecznej – między tradycją a współczesnymi zadaniami. W: H. Červinková i B.D. Gołębniak (red.), Edukacyjne badania w działaniu (s. 13-50). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Stake, R. (1976).. Evaluating Education programs: The Need and the Response. Wydawnictwo OECD.

Published
2023-03-29
How to Cite
Borowska, A. (2023). The Research Process in Crtical-Participative- ‑Educational Action Research – Reconnaissance and Dynamic Action Cycles. HORIZONS OF EDUCATION, 22(61), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2023.2261.14